Jensen, L.G. and Løvschall, C. and Ladehoff Thomsen, A.M. and Valentin, G. and Risør , B.W. and Gutierrez-Ibarluzea, I. and Galnares-Cordero, L. and Benguria-Arrate, G. (2019): Custom-made or customisable 3D printed implants and cutting guides versus non- 3D printed standard implants and cutting guides for improving outcome in patients undergoing knee, maxillofacial, or cranial surgery. HTA-Projektbericht 117.
|PDF - Sie müssen einen PDF-Viewer auf Ihrem PC installiert haben wie z. B. GSview, Xpdf oder Adobe Acrobat Reader|
3D printed custom-made or customisable implants and cutting guides are currently most frequently applied in knee, maxillofacial, and cranial surgery. Evidence of very low or low quality shows significant differences in precision, both in terms of malalignment and deviation between 3D printed technology and standard instrumentation in knee arthroplasty. Evidence of higher quality is needed to validate these significant results and draw final conclusions. No firm conclusions can be made in mandibular reconstruction and cranioplasty, since no outcomes were significant in favour of either technology. No statements regarding long-term safety outcomes can be made.
|Item Type:||Project Report|
|Keywords:||3D printing, surgical guide, cutting guide, custom-made or customisable medical devices/implants/instruments, knee surgery, maxillofacial surgery, cranial surgery|
|Subjects:||WO Surgery > WO 500-517 Operative surgical procedures. Techniques|
WO Surgery > WO 600-640 Plastic surgery
WE Musculoskeletal system > WE 300-400 Joint tissues
WU Dentistry. Oral surgery
WE Musculoskeletal system > WE 168-190 Orthopedics
|Series Name:||HTA-Projektbericht 117|
|Deposited on:||30 Jul 2019 12:57|
|Last Modified:||30 Jul 2019 14:04|
Repository Staff Only: item control page